Nursing Home Comparison: Eliseo vs. Avamere At Pacific Ridge

           
           
All Tacoma, WA Homes                 View Eliseo Profile                 View Avamere At Pacific Ridge Profile            

Visual Comparison of Key Metrics

Comparison Summary

The facility Eliseo holds the edge in overall quality, scoring 4 Stars compared to Avamere At Pacific Ridge's 1 Stars. When reviewing the core nursing resources, Avamere At Pacific Ridge reports a higher licensed nursing staff ratio, providing 1.74 hours of licensed nurse care per resident day (National Average is 1.4 hours). Avamere At Pacific Ridge is part of the Avamere chain, which holds an average overall rating of 2.60. Regarding recent health inspection history, both facilities had deficiencies in their most recent survey, with Eliseo recording 19 total deficiencies and Avamere At Pacific Ridge recording 29.Finally, in terms of compliance history, Eliseo has a clean record with no fines, while Avamere At Pacific Ridge has incurred total penalties of $88,895.00.

*Staffing, resident, and quality ratings are based on the latest data provided by CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services).

Side-by-Side Facility Metrics
MetricEliseoAvamere At Pacific Ridge
Facility NameEliseoAvamere At Pacific Ridge
Street Address1301 N Highlands Parkway3625 East B Street
CityTacomaTacoma
StateWAWA
Zip Code9840698404
Phone Number(253) 752-7112(253) 475-2507
Ownership TypeNon profit - CorporationFor profit - Corporation
Chain NameNot Part of a ChainAvamere
No. of Facilities in ChainNot Available33
Overall CMS Rating4 Stars 4 star rating1 Stars 1 star rating
Staffing Rating3 Stars 3 star rating4 Stars 4 star rating
Quality Measures Rating5 Stars 5 star rating4 Stars 4 star rating
Licensed Nursing Hours/Resident Day1.61 hrs1.74 hrs
CNA Hours/Resident Day (Minutes)172 min211 min
Certified Bed Count187102
Total Residents Average123.70.6
Total Penalties (Fines)$0.00$88,895.00
Chain Avg. Overall Rating (1-5)Not Available2.60
Chain Avg. Health InspectionNot Available2.40
Chain Avg. Staffing RatingNot Available3.60
Chain Avg. Quality RatingNot Available3.50
Cycle 1 Total Deficiencies1929
Cycle 2 Total Deficiencies2117