Nursing Home Comparison: Eliseo vs. Park Rose Care Center

           
           
All Tacoma, WA Homes                 View Eliseo Profile                 View Park Rose Care Center Profile            

Visual Comparison of Key Metrics

Comparison Summary

The facility Eliseo holds the edge in overall quality, scoring 4 Stars compared to Park Rose Care Center's 2 Stars. When reviewing the core nursing resources, Park Rose Care Center reports a higher licensed nursing staff ratio, providing 2.21 hours of licensed nurse care per resident day (National Average is 1.4 hours). Park Rose Care Center is part of the Regency Pacific Management chain, which holds an average overall rating of 3.50. Regarding recent health inspection history, both facilities had deficiencies in their most recent survey, with Eliseo recording 19 total deficiencies and Park Rose Care Center recording 23.Finally, in terms of compliance history, Eliseo has a clean record with no fines, while Park Rose Care Center has incurred total penalties of $266,452.88.

*Staffing, resident, and quality ratings are based on the latest data provided by CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services).

Side-by-Side Facility Metrics
MetricEliseoPark Rose Care Center
Facility NameEliseoPark Rose Care Center
Street Address1301 N Highlands Parkway3919 South 19th Street
CityTacomaTacoma
StateWAWA
Zip Code9840698405
Phone Number(253) 752-7112(253) 752-5677
Ownership TypeNon profit - CorporationFor profit - Limited Liability company
Chain NameNot Part of a ChainRegency Pacific Management
No. of Facilities in ChainNot Available27
Overall CMS Rating4 Stars 4 star rating2 Stars 2 star rating
Staffing Rating3 Stars 3 star rating2 Stars 2 star rating
Quality Measures Rating5 Stars 5 star rating2 Stars 2 star rating
Licensed Nursing Hours/Resident Day1.61 hrs2.21 hrs
CNA Hours/Resident Day (Minutes)172 min194 min
Certified Bed Count187139
Total Residents Average123.95.3
Total Penalties (Fines)$0.00$266,452.88
Chain Avg. Overall Rating (1-5)Not Available3.50
Chain Avg. Health InspectionNot Available3.40
Chain Avg. Staffing RatingNot Available3.90
Chain Avg. Quality RatingNot Available3.40
Cycle 1 Total Deficiencies1923
Cycle 2 Total Deficiencies2138