Nursing Home Comparison: Avamere At Pacific Ridge vs. Eliseo

           
           
All Tacoma, WA Homes                 View Avamere At Pacific Ridge Profile                 View Eliseo Profile            

Visual Comparison of Key Metrics

Comparison Summary

The facility Eliseo holds the edge in overall quality, scoring 4 Stars compared to Avamere At Pacific Ridge's 1 Stars. When reviewing the core nursing resources, Avamere At Pacific Ridge reports a higher licensed nursing staff ratio, providing 1.74 hours of licensed nurse care per resident day (National Average is 1.4 hours). Avamere At Pacific Ridge is part of the Avamere chain, which holds an average overall rating of 2.60. Regarding recent health inspection history, both facilities had deficiencies in their most recent survey, with Avamere At Pacific Ridge recording 29 total deficiencies and Eliseo recording 19.Finally, in terms of compliance history, Eliseo has a clean record with no fines, while Avamere At Pacific Ridge has incurred total penalties of $88,895.00.

*Staffing, resident, and quality ratings are based on the latest data provided by CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services).

Side-by-Side Facility Metrics
MetricAvamere At Pacific RidgeEliseo
Facility NameAvamere At Pacific RidgeEliseo
Street Address3625 East B Street1301 N Highlands Parkway
CityTacomaTacoma
StateWAWA
Zip Code9840498406
Phone Number(253) 475-2507(253) 752-7112
Ownership TypeFor profit - CorporationNon profit - Corporation
Chain NameAvamereNot Part of a Chain
No. of Facilities in Chain33Not Available
Overall CMS Rating1 Stars 1 star rating4 Stars 4 star rating
Staffing Rating4 Stars 4 star rating3 Stars 3 star rating
Quality Measures Rating4 Stars 4 star rating5 Stars 5 star rating
Licensed Nursing Hours/Resident Day1.74 hrs1.61 hrs
CNA Hours/Resident Day (Minutes)211 min172 min
Certified Bed Count102187
Total Residents Average70.6123.
Total Penalties (Fines)$88,895.00$0.00
Chain Avg. Overall Rating (1-5)2.60Not Available
Chain Avg. Health Inspection2.40Not Available
Chain Avg. Staffing Rating3.60Not Available
Chain Avg. Quality Rating3.50Not Available
Cycle 1 Total Deficiencies2919
Cycle 2 Total Deficiencies1721