Nursing Home Comparison: Gracelen Care Center vs. Reedwood Post Acute

All Portland, OR Homes View Gracelen Care Center Profile View Reedwood Post Acute Profile
🤝 Quickly Compare Local Facilities

Compare **Gracelen Care Center** side-by-side with a another Skilled Nursing Home Facility in Portland, OR.

Visual Comparison of Key Metrics

Comparison Summary

The facility Reedwood Post Acute holds the edge in overall quality, scoring 5 Stars compared to Gracelen Care Center's 1 Stars. When reviewing the core nursing resources, Reedwood Post Acute reports a higher licensed nursing staff ratio, providing 1.29 hours of licensed nurse care per resident day (National Average is 1.4 hours). Reedwood Post Acute is part of the Prestige Care chain, which holds an average overall rating of 2.70. Regarding recent health inspection history, both facilities had deficiencies in their most recent survey, with Gracelen Care Center recording 16 total deficiencies and Reedwood Post Acute recording 5.Finally, both facilities have a clean compliance record with no reported penalties in the latest data.

*Staffing, resident, and quality ratings are based on the latest data provided by CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services).

Side-by-Side Facility Metrics
MetricGracelen Care CenterReedwood Post Acute
Facility NameGracelen Care CenterReedwood Post Acute
Street Address10948 S.e. Boise3540 Se Francis Street
CityPortlandPortland
StateOROR
Zip Code9726697202
Phone Number(503) 760-1727(503) 232-5767
Ownership TypeFor profit - CorporationFor profit - Corporation
Chain NameNot Part of a ChainPrestige Care
No. of Facilities in ChainNot Available23
Overall CMS Rating1 Stars 1 star rating5 Stars 5 star rating
Staffing Rating3 Stars 3 star rating5 Stars 5 star rating
Quality Measures Rating3 Stars 3 star rating4 Stars 4 star rating
Licensed Nursing Hours/Resident Day1.05 hrs1.29 hrs
CNA Hours/Resident Day (Minutes)206 min169 min
Certified Bed Count8064
Total Residents Average66.148.7
Total Penalties (Fines)$0.00$0.00
Chain Avg. Overall Rating (1-5)Not Available2.70
Chain Avg. Health InspectionNot Available2.70
Chain Avg. Staffing RatingNot Available3.20
Chain Avg. Quality RatingNot Available3.60
Cycle 1 Total Deficiencies165
Cycle 2 Total Deficiencies315