Nursing Home Comparison: Reedwood Post Acute vs. Gracelen Care Center

All Portland, OR Homes View Reedwood Post Acute Profile View Gracelen Care Center Profile
🤝 Quickly Compare Local Facilities

Compare **Reedwood Post Acute** side-by-side with a another Skilled Nursing Home Facility in Portland, OR.

Visual Comparison of Key Metrics

Comparison Summary

The facility Reedwood Post Acute holds the edge in overall quality, scoring 5 Stars compared to Gracelen Care Center's 1 Stars. When reviewing the core nursing resources, Reedwood Post Acute reports a higher licensed nursing staff ratio, providing 1.29 hours of licensed nurse care per resident day (National Average is 1.4 hours). Reedwood Post Acute is part of the Prestige Care chain, which holds an average overall rating of 2.70. Regarding recent health inspection history, both facilities had deficiencies in their most recent survey, with Reedwood Post Acute recording 5 total deficiencies and Gracelen Care Center recording 16.Finally, both facilities have a clean compliance record with no reported penalties in the latest data.

*Staffing, resident, and quality ratings are based on the latest data provided by CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services).

Side-by-Side Facility Metrics
MetricReedwood Post AcuteGracelen Care Center
Facility NameReedwood Post AcuteGracelen Care Center
Street Address3540 Se Francis Street10948 S.e. Boise
CityPortlandPortland
StateOROR
Zip Code9720297266
Phone Number(503) 232-5767(503) 760-1727
Ownership TypeFor profit - CorporationFor profit - Corporation
Chain NamePrestige CareNot Part of a Chain
No. of Facilities in Chain23Not Available
Overall CMS Rating5 Stars 5 star rating1 Stars 1 star rating
Staffing Rating5 Stars 5 star rating3 Stars 3 star rating
Quality Measures Rating4 Stars 4 star rating3 Stars 3 star rating
Licensed Nursing Hours/Resident Day1.29 hrs1.05 hrs
CNA Hours/Resident Day (Minutes)169 min206 min
Certified Bed Count6480
Total Residents Average48.766.1
Total Penalties (Fines)$0.00$0.00
Chain Avg. Overall Rating (1-5)2.70Not Available
Chain Avg. Health Inspection2.70Not Available
Chain Avg. Staffing Rating3.20Not Available
Chain Avg. Quality Rating3.60Not Available
Cycle 1 Total Deficiencies516
Cycle 2 Total Deficiencies531